This issue was discussed last year. Sort out the ideas and add a few more sentences.

I think:

In which era, superstars will be superstars, and so will Curry.

The difference is nothing more than what can be achieved under the rule of different coaches-if you can meet old Nelson or Riley, then maybe the times will change ahead of time.

Stephen Curry, under Mark Jackson, was an all-star defender with an average of 24 points and 9 assists in the game; Cole took over and matched the array. Curry immediately took off to become a historical attacker, Lian Zhuang MVP, historical data, a championship.

For example, Nash was under old Nelson in Dallas, an all-star, and three league matches; He went to the Sun Denny, and played well in two regular season MVP, champion, and historical attacker.

When Curry was first popular, many people found him an old Template: similar energy transfer and Magic basket: Mark Price, Abdel Raouf and so on.

Price is a short white version of curry.

In the 1992-93 season, NBA was not popular to shoot three points, and the total NBA shot by 10 percent.

It does not hinder price to take the third place in the east of the Knight. He averaged 18 points and 8 assists in the game, with a hit rate of 48%+42%+95%, and tied for a defender in the league with Jordan. The next year he also went to the Dream II team.

Everyone who has seen price plays knows that it is a weakened version of curry-in fact, he may be more like a short version of Nash than curry-but he can also join the league for a while.

The knight was friendly to the shooter. Their number 4 was Steve Cole.

Cole later went to bull to wear the 25th-Knight’s 25th, which was price.

Curry’s playing method of holding the ball, you can refer to the Knight version of price; No ball configuration, you can refer to the Walker version of Reggie Miller.

Miller’s regular season data is not very obvious, but the six Eastern finals of his career, of which three times were defeated 3 to 4, otherwise he could reach the finals-the three times were the Knicks who lost to Ewing, shark magic and Jordan’s bull in the last year.

Larry Brown and Larry Bird, who set up the right team around Miller, will enable Miller to bring Smith, old Mark Jackson and two Davis into the NBA finals.

Curry’s ability to hold the ball is higher than price, and the position without the ball is higher than Miller’s. He is also the head of two people.

Give him a long man like a Walker/Knight to the front court, give him a smart man like Doherty/Smith, and give him a tough front line like Nance/Davis.

The most suitable configuration for curry is Charlotte Hornets from 1996 to 97:

The Wasp at that time, Mason, who was 201cm high in Defense + organization Forward (16 points per game, 11 rebounds and 6 assists), was the center bearded diwatts (13 points per game, 9 rebounds, 4 assists and 2 blocks per game), the top player of the league All-Star game MVP Glenn Rice (with an average of 27 points), plus Curry’s own father del Curry, easily won 54.

Mason was a dream-chasing in the 1990’s.

Divac can be regarded as Bogut in the 1990’s.

Curry Ping went in instead of Les-his ball-free, ball-holding and long-range shooting were all above Les-or instead of his own father, could this team play?

Originally, the topic was finished, but I still want to talk a few more words:

In fact, the gap between top players in different times may not be as big as everyone imagined.

The Curry era and Jordan era were not run through by no one.

Ray Allen entered the business in 1996.

Jordan in the last year of the bull, Ray Allen’s second grade started steadily, with an average of 20+5+4,43%+36%+88%, per16.

At the age of 35, Ray Allen averaged 36 minutes, 17 minutes, 3 rebounds and 3 assists, 49%+44%+88%, per16.

Ray Allen calculated the name of a stable player. In 1998 and 2010, from Jordan era to Curry era, the gap seemed not big?

Duncan 1997-98 season every 36 minutes 19+11+3+2, hit rate 55%.

By the 2009-10 season, Duncan had 21+11+4 every 36 minutes, with a hit rate of 51%.

Duncan worked out the name and did not move LUSN. From the last year of Jordan’s era to Curry’s era, it seems that the gap is not so great?

In the 2009-10 season, Curry’s second grade averaged 19+4+6, and the third hit rate was 48%+44%+93%.

It seems that there is no sign that he can’t play in the 1990’s……

Of course, I know a lot of people will say, “Curry’s three-point ball couldn’t be played in the 1990’s”. Indeed, it was not popular to throw three points in the 1990’s. He just started to cast a lot of shots, it is estimated that he will be scolded by the coach.

But from another perspective: coaches between the elderly are not blind, especially in the early 1990 s, it was the time when the three-pointer was popular. If you really vote correctly, a coach will give you the green light.

Back to Jordan’s era, let’s talk about a typical case.

Dana Barros, a small defender, played 27 starts in the first four years of his career.

In the 1993-94 season, he scored 13 points and 5 assists per game, with a three-point rate of 38%: because he had a strong hand and scored three points.

In the 1994-95 season of the next year, 76 people in Philadelphia gave Dana Barros unlimited firing power. Barros scored 2.4 three-point goals in 5.2 games, with a hit rate of 46%. Entered the all-star-this all-star is probably unknown now, why? Just because he has one hand to hold the ball and pull out the three-point ball.

Next year, he went to Boston to play a substitute, and he still had unlimited fire power, with 1.9 shots per game at 4.6.

In fact, in the 1996-97 season, Tim Hadavi shot 8 3-pointers with a hit rate of 34 percent per game.

— Shoot behind the arc was really unpopular in that era, but if you vote correctly, you can still vote fengshui ball, and the whole team will give you the green light.

-If you are right, Jordan will pass you at a critical moment……

Therefore, the accuracy and range of Barros and Tim Hadavi can allow the team to give them unlimited fire power.

Stephen Curry was in the 1990 s, and the coach was not allowed to let him throw enough because of his ability to call the ancient and modern threat of no ball + fengshui ball three points?

The biggest difference between the 1990 s and this generation is actually the width of the space under the basket, which affects more breakthroughs.

It is very popular in any era to beat the peripheral shooting of ancient and modern times and the ability of free attack that can be shot anytime and anywhere.

Finally, say a piece of inheritance.

Tim Hadavi entered NBA in 1989. He averaged 13 shots in the first season and scored 1.1 three-pointers.

Two years later, he scored 5 three-pointer shots per game, with an average of 23 points and 10 assists; Who allowed him to vote? Coach Nelson, a mad scientist.

By 1997-97, he averaged 7.3 three-point shots at the Miami Heat field. Who allowed him to vote? Pat Riley.

The pioneering consciousness of old Nelson and Riley is so obvious.

Nash rookie scored less than one three-point goal in the annual game, and 4 three-point goals in the 2001-02 season. Who allowed him to vote? Old Nelson.

Later Nash went to the sun and became the MVP.

In 2009, Cole was in the sun. He once wanted to choose Curry and let Curry pick up Nash’s mantle, but the Warriors took the lead.

Larry Riley, general manager of warriors. What did he do before?

A: senior Nelson’s assistant.

Old Nelson and his teaching assistants, as well as warriors, Tim Hadavi, Dallas, Phoenix and Nash, had many bold experiments, many permission liberalization and many crazy ideas-finally merged into curry.

The era’s feedback to innovative idealists.